Category Archives: Latest Alliance News

President-elect Trump Nominates Dr. Carson

President-elect Donald Trump has nominated Dr. Ben Carson to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
 
We are eager to work with the Trump Administration and Dr. Carson to create more opportunities for Americans to access affordable housing, and to ensure the most vulnerable individuals and families in need of supportive housing are housed in their own homes and healthy.
 
Our economic future depends on finding sustainable ways to ensure everyone, regardless of race, color, religion, gender, age, family status or income, can access and afford safe, decent rental housing. Not only is this crucial today, but for our children and grandchildren too.
 
For those in need of supportive housing, their very lives depend on finding stable homes with access to the healthcare and other services that offer them the chance to move forward with independence and purpose, which benefits everyone in the community. In too many instances, our nation continues to over-rely on expensive institutional care that inadequately houses and fails to address the needs of the most vulnerable people, shortchanging them and the rest of us. Supportive housing is a proven, cost-effective alternative that empowers individuals and families to thrive within our communities.
 
Evidence tells us housing is a key social determinant of health for individuals and communities alike, and CSH will continue to work with policymakers at all levels to enhance and increase the integration of housing and healthcare.
 
CSH will be in the forefront of ensuring the new Administration and Congress have the extensive data, reports and personal stories demonstrating beyond question that supportive housing works, is cost-effective, holds down healthcare and public safety costs, revitalizes neighborhoods, and creates jobs and economic development, making a real difference in communities across this country.
 
As Dr. Carson begins his transition to HUD, we stand ready to join with him to expand on the progress supportive housing has made for nearly 40 years.

Deborah De Santis
President and CEO
CSH

The above information was provided by the Corporation for Supportive Housing in an email, December 8th.

Nearly 30 Million People Would Lose Health Insurance Under ACA Repeal

Nearly 30 million people would lose their health insurance coverage if the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is repealed, data from the Urban Institute show. We have published fact sheets showing the number of people who would lose coverage and the loss of related federal funding in each state.

Republican policymakers plan to move quickly in January to repeal much of the health reform law without enacting a replacement. This would cause families across the country to go without needed health care and expose them to financial risk.

Most of the coverage loss would occur among families with at least one worker and among people without college degrees, doubling the number of uninsured and leaving a higher share of people uninsured than before the ACA

States would lose significant federal funds. Even states that didn’t expand Medicaid would see declines in federal spending as eligible people fall off the program. The growth in the number of uninsured residents would increase demand for uncompensated care by $1.1 trillion between 2019 and 2028.

Repealing the ACA without putting in place an adequate replacement plan that ensures affordable coverage would more than double the total number of uninsured to 58.7 million people, greater than the number who were uninsured prior to enactment of the ACA. 

Read the Fact Sheets

Read Judy Solomon’s Analysis of the Urban Data

The above information was provided by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in an email, December 7th.

2016 Point in Time Report

Below you will find a link to the  2016 Point in Time Report just released by the USIACH. 

Nationally, there’s been a 3% reduction in homelessness compared to a 23% reduction in Mercer.   The USIACH reports that family homelessness across the country decreased by 5% since 2015 , whereas family homelessness in Mercer decreased by 18% since 2015.

Continuing to Drive Progress in Ending Homelessness

Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development released its annual Point-in-Time count results, reporting steady reductions in homelessness between 2010 and 2016. We’ll provide a more detailed analysis of this data in the weeks ahead, but in the meantime, we encourage everyone to:  

Read the Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress, Part I.

Read HUD’s press release about the Point-in-Time data.

Remarks from Executive Director Matthew Doherty on the 2016 Point-in-Time Count Data

At the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness we find this data, on the whole, very encouraging. We’ve steadily reduced homelessness since

Opening Doors was launched in 2010. The arrows are pointing in the right direction. But we can and must do even better.

About the Data

First, I want to offer a few thoughts about what this specific data helps us understand. This data in this report is based on data gathered and submitted by communities across the country through their local counts.

Such point-in-time data provides us with a snapshot of the estimated number and demographics of people who are experiencing homelessness at a given point of time – in this case, from about 11 months ago, January 2016.

This data helps to estimate how much day-to-day capacity we need within our homelessness crisis response systems. And it also helps us assess the impact of our strategic activities up until that point.

But it is not the only data that we consider, and it is not the only data that communities should use to guide the strategic decisions and tailor the interventions that we need to end homelessness.

We also need to consider sources of annualized data that help us understand the number of people who experience homelessness or housing instability over the course of a year. Such data helps paint a more complete picture of the state of homelessness and housing needs in our country.

There are a couple of key sources of such data:

  • Last month, HUD released part II of its 2015 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress based upon Homeless Management Information System data, which documents the number of people who experience homelessness in shelters over the course of the year. This data showed that between 2014 and 2015, the number of people experiencing sheltered homelessness at some point during the reporting year remained roughly the same, declining by less than 1%.
     
  • For understanding the scope and scale of homelessness among youth and families with children, we also closely consider the data gathered by schools for the Department of Education. This annualized data documents the number of children enrolled in public schools who are identified as experiencing homelessness at some point during the school year – including children who are living in shelters or who are unsheltered – and also includes children who may be staying in motels or in doubled-up arrangements. This data showed an 8% increase between the 2013 and 2014 school years, and we’ll be looking closely at what the 2015 data tells us.

I would encourage you to spend some time with all of those data sets, and reach out to us if you would like to talk through this data.

 What’s Working

I want to offer a few thoughts on some of the strategies that have driven our progress to date, specifically three key elements that I think have had a huge impact:

First, we set ambitious goals and asked leaders to publicly commit to them. For example, the Mayors Challenge has helped to drive the remarkable 47% reduction in Veteran homelessness, including a 17% reduction during 2015 alone. And we now have the opportunity to take the proof of what is possible for Veterans and apply those lessons and strategies to ending homelessness for people with disabilities, for families with children, for youth – for everyone.

Second, we provided clear guidance and direction on what it takes to succeed, equipping communities with a full array of strategies and tools to help them implement the best practices. For example, HUD’s technical assistance efforts have helped communities to use resources more effectively, to embrace the strongest models, and to use data to drive their decision making. And communities are moving beyond using not just point-in-time estimates to having real-time information about people experiencing homelessness at any given time – who they are, what their needs are, who is working with them.

Third, by embracing Housing First approaches, federal agencies are making sure that federal dollars have the greatest impact and improves outcomes for people. Programs are removing unnecessary obstacles and barriers, helping people get into permanent housing as quickly as possible, and providing them with essential services to be successful.

The Work Ahead

But our work is clearly not done, so I also wanted to talk about a few of the things we need to be urgently focusing on in the months and years ahead to pick up the pace of our progress.

We must increase the supply of affordable housing. We must continue to target and prioritize existing affordable housing to people exiting homelessness, but we must also take steps to increase the overall supply of housing units within our communities. Jurisdictions need to remove local barriers to housing development that have reduced the ability of many housing markets to respond to growing demand. And we must invest in new affordable housing across all levels of government. 

We must continue to improve connections to mainstream programs and employment services and opportunities. To both prevent homelessness, and to ensure the success and stability of people who are experiencing or have exited homelessness, we must do more to connect people to health and social services, and to integrate employment services and opportunities into our housing and services systems.

And finally, we must maintain partnerships at all levels of government.To sustain the progress we’ve made to date, we must continue to pursue a collaborative approach across federal, state, and local government. And we must sustain our investments into the strategies and programs that are working, knowing that our communities must have lasting systems that are poised to respond to crisis every day.

As always, we thank you for your dedication to making sure every American has a safe and stable home.

Mercer Alliance to End Homelessness recognized for its role to successfully reduce family homelessness

We are proud to be part of a working community alliance of true professionals dedicated to combating and ending homelessness”, said Executive Director Frank Cirillo.

11-15-16: Hughes to be honored by National Alliance to end Homelessness TRENTON, N.J.—Mercer County Executive Brian M. Hughes will be honored by the National Alliance to End Homelessness for his leadership in Mercer County’s successful efforts to reduce family homelessness.

Mr. Hughes will receive the award at the national organization’s Annual Awards Ceremony on Nov. 17 at the Newseum in Washington, D.C. The ceremony, “When a Child Has a Home,” will highlight successes in ending child and family homelessness.

This year’s event will be attended by corporate executives, representatives of Congress and the Administration, and many other committed stakeholders. Organizers said that by recognizing the progress being made across the country, the event seeks to heighten the national conversation on the importance of ending homelessness for children and their families.

“I’m honored to be receiving this award on behalf of everyone who has worked so hard to reduce the number of homeless people in Mercer County,” Mr. Hughes said. “I believe Mercer County can serve as a model for other communities that are looking for proven ways to help some of our most vulnerable neighbors achieve better lives. We could not have achieved this success without our dedicated partners, and I share this award with our colleagues from the City of Trenton, Mercer Alliance to End Homelessness, Mercer County Board of Social Services and Catholic Charities.”

By using an approach called Rapid Rehousing, an intervention designed to help individuals and families quickly exit homelessness and return to permanent housing, Mercer has been able to reduce its number of homeless families by 70 percent. Since 2010, more than 1,000 homeless families have been rapidly rehoused by moving into their own apartments within 54 days of entering the homeless system, Mr. Hughes said. Before the transformation, families were remaining in emergency shelters and transitional housing for up to a year.

“Best of all,” he said, “94 percent of families who have been rapidly rehoused have not become homeless again.”

Increasing Payroll Taxes would Strengthen Social Security

Romig, Kathleen (2016, September 27)
Increasing Payroll Taxes Would Strengthen Social Security
http://www.cbpp.org

Social Security is currently facing a significant – though manageable – long-term funding shortfall, which policymakers can address primarily by increasing Social Security’s tax revenues.

Not only is boosting Social Security’s payroll tax revenue justified by recent trends in inequality and the cost of health insurance, the majority of Americans oppose cuts to the program and support strengthening it by contributing more in taxes.

In a new CBPP paper, we present the three approaches to increasing payroll taxes, including: increasing or eliminating Social Security’s cap on taxable wages, expanding compensation subject to Social Security payroll taxes, and increasing Social Security payroll tax rates.

Social Security provides a foundation of income for workers and their families, and they pay for these benefits primarily through payroll tax contributions. Read the full report to learn more on how policymakers should address Social Security’s long-term funding shortfall.

Read the Report

Download the PDF (14pp)

Recent newsclips shared by the New Jersey Department of Human Services, Director of Community Outreach

Bancroft opens Health and Wellness Center at Lakeside

NJ.com, September 23, 2016—By: Community Bulletin

Bancroft ribbon cutting

Bancroft celebrates the opening of The Health and Wellness Center at Lakeside thanks to the generosity of Salem Health and Wellness Foundation grant. Pictured, from left, Medical Director Kurt Miceli, M.D., Brenda Goins, Executive Director of the Salem Health and Wellness Foundation; Toni Pergolin, President and CEO, Bancroft; Adam Taliaferro, Assemblyman; and Melissa Decastro, Freeholder. (Submitted photo)

MULLICAL HILL —  On Sept. 22, Bancroft, the largest organization in New Jersey  providing education, support and services to children and adults with autism, intellectual and developmental disabilities, opened its state-of-the-art Health and Wellness Center at Lakeside. The facility is located on the Bancroft site where adults reside, enabling them to receive essential medical treatment right on campus and was made possible thanks to a $197,548 grant from the Salem Health and Wellness Foundation and the Community Foundation of New Jersey.

Adults with autism and other intellectual and developmental disabilities face immense challenges when they need medical intervention. A simple physical at the doctor’s office can incite fear, anxiety and aggressive behaviors. The Health & Wellness Center at Lakeside opens a world of opportunity and enables individuals to not only visit their physicians, but also to practice visiting the office as part of their desensitization therapy before medical treatment is necessary.

“The Health and Wellness Center at Lakeside represents the next wave of essential services Bancroft is able to provide thanks to our valued community partners,” said Toni Pergolin, Bancroft President and CEO. “As we continue to grow and expand throughout the region to meet an increased demand for autism services, we are grateful to be able to continue to enhance medical and residential options for families as well.”

“The Salem Health and Wellness Foundation has been delighted to partner with Bancroft to bring medical treatment and desensitization services directly to individuals who need them, improving access to care and quality of life for these adults,” said Brenda Goins, executive director of the foundation.

The program included a ribbon cutting ceremony and tours of the new facility, which is comprised of a comfortable waiting area and several treatment rooms. Speakers at the event included Assemblyman Adam Taliaferro, Bancroft CEO Toni Pergolin and Bancroft Medical Director Dr. Kurt Miceli as well as Brenda Goins with the Salem Health and Wellness Foundation.

Bancroft is a leading nonprofit provider of specialized services for individuals with autism, other intellectual or developmental disabilities and those in need of neurological rehabilitation. For nearly 133 years, Bancroft has been pioneering new ways of helping people with disabilities lead independent and fulfilling lives. Headquartered in Cherry Hill, Bancroft boasts 30 programs in 16 locations serving 1,700 people annually throughout New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware, including more than 200 community-based group homes and supervised apartments. For more information, visit bancroft.org.

This item submitted by Kathryn Conda for Bancroft.

The Doctor Is In. In Your House, That Is.

NY Times, September 23, 2016—By: John F. Wasik

Dr. Thomas Cornwell with a patient, Mary Hanrahan

Dr. Thomas Cornwell with a patient, Mary Hanrahan, at her home. “For the horribly sick, hospitals are the worst place,” he says. Credit Whitten Sabbatini for The New York Times

REMEMBER when doctors made house calls?

While only a relative handful of doctors still offer them, there is growing evidence that comprehensive home medical care could be a viable alternative to the attendant woes and soaring expenses of institutional health services, particularly for those in late retirement.

It will take some important legislative changes before focused; less intrusive care in a dignified, comfortable setting can become more widely available. The polarizing politics surrounding the Affordable Care Act makes any reform to the health care system particularly challenging. Still, given the overall popularity of Medicare — Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump both say they support it — getting a new home medical care benefit through Congress looks more promising.

At the heart of the home care renaissance is a combination of high-tech, portable medical equipment and the age-old practice of doctors coming into the home to personally examine and treat their patients.

“We can do X-rays, EKGs, medical records and other applications in the home,” said Dr. Thomas Cornwell, who has made more than 32,000 house calls in his Chicago-based practice and wants to see Medicare support more home-based medical care.

“I had a 92-year-old patient with a very high temperature,” Dr. Cornwell said, citing an example. “I brought in a portable X-ray and diagnosed pneumonia; she didn’t have to go to the hospital, and lived four more years.”

Dr. Cornwell is spearheading a national effort to revive physician house calls even as he pushes for doctors to be more fully compensated by Medicare for doing them. He is also training doctors to offer home-based care through the House Call Project, which is sponsored by the Home Centered Care Institute. He is chief executive of the nonprofit institute.

Home medical care may well be the key missing link in the “aging in place” model aimed at helping millions more older adults avoid spending the last years of their lives in nursing homes and other institutions.

Over the past decades, however, home care has been dwarfed by the significant shift of treatment to offices, clinics and hospitals. More than 50,000 practitioners work exclusively in hospitals, compared to about 5,000 doctors who make home-based visits to Medicare patients.

But a modest counterrevolution toward home care, devoted to a lower-cost, patient-centered approach, is underway. House calls to Medicare patients rose from 1.5 million in 1995 to more than 2.6 million in 2014, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Dr. Cornwell used his smartphone to read Ms. Hanrahan’s heart rate.

Dr. Cornwell used his smartphone to read Ms. Hanrahan’s heart rate. Credit Whitten Sabbatini for The New York Times

Generally, the most expensive patients to treat have myriad health problems like diabetes and congestive heart failure. The top 5 percent of care-intensive patients account for 50 percent of total medical expenses, according to government data, with a median cost of more than $43,000 per person.

Dr. Cornwell and others argue that many of these gravely ill Americans can be better cared for — at less overall expense — at home.

“People want to be at home,” said Dr. Joanne G. Schwartzberg, a scholar-in-residence at the Accreditation Council for the Graduate Medical Education, who is working with Dr. Cornwell to advance home-based care. “Research has shown that these patients have better health outcomes at much lower costs. Now the challenge is to train more physicians in providing this complex but rewarding form of medical care.”

For now, people looking for home medical services need to do their own research. A nearby hospital may already offer a program. Referrals are also obtainable through visiting nurse associations or the American Academy of Home Care Medicine.

There are signs that the triad of care using doctors, nurses and the latest technology could help patients with multiple conditions.

Linda V. DeCherrie, who runs one of the largest academic house call programs in the country out of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital in Manhattan, received a $9.6 million Medicare innovation award to study the expansion of home care “to include hospital level care at home and what it means for patients.”

Dr. DeCherrie, who supervises two programs at Mount Sinai that treat more than 1,500 patients, says comprehensive home-based health care “has the potential to provide solutions for many problems,” suggesting that seeing patients in their natural environment may offer improved care.

“It can be quite an ordeal to see a doctor in a hospital if you are a frail older adult,” Dr. DeCherrie said. “Patients are much happier not to have to go through that. In a home, you can get a better picture of what’s going on.”

The next step for broad-based home medical care is a legislative push to expand Medicare’s reach into the home and to revamp the prevailing fee-for-service model that rewards quantity of treatment over quality and cost savings.

Medical Assistant, Rachel Kay

A medical assistant, Rachel Kay, takes notes during a house call. Electronic medical records and portable diagnostic equipment like X-ray and EKG machines make home care easier.

Unless the traditional economic model is changed, experts say, few doctors would be interested in providing home-based care. It’s often a money loser for physicians under the current system.

Dr. Cornwell said he would like to see a new payment model that would allow Medicare to share any savings — relative to hospitalization — with doctors who make house calls.

“It would have profound national impact,” Dr. Cornwell said. “It would save billions in health care costs. For the horribly sick, hospitals are the worst place.”

The Independence at Home Act (S. 3130), a bill supported by a bipartisan group of senators, would expand a Medicare home care demonstration program “so that it can benefit more Medicare beneficiaries with severe chronic illness and disability through coordinated, home-based primary care,” according to an endorsement letter backed by organizations including AARP and the Retirement Research Foundation.

The first phase of the home medical care program demonstrated medical cost savings of $35 million — ranging from $1,000 to $3,000 per patient. Another independent study conducted by the Department of Veterans Affairs showed a 24 percent reduction in total costs and 62 percent fewer hospital stays, translating to some $9,000 in savings per veteran using home-based care.

Although the home medical care bill is unlikely to see action in Congress this year, Dr. Cornwell hopes it may be revived next year. But many policies, fiscal and political hurdles need to be crossed before home care can really take off.

How will doctors be monitored in the home? How will Medicare gauge the effectiveness of home-based treatments? Will Medicare reimbursement be enough to cover the costs of physicians, nurses and equipment? What about long-term care financing in addition to primary care that could provide better funding for custodial care outside of nursing homes?

Those questions, among others, are being considered by a diverse group of lawmakers, health care professionals and Medicare officials. Whether long-term care costs, which often include nonmedical caregiver or semiskilled home care, should also receive more support through government programs is another challenging issue.

“Many people who need help with basic tasks of daily life want to and can remain at home, rather than being forced to live in institutions in order to get care,” said Judith Feder, a professor of public policy at Georgetown.

The image of a doctor making house calls may recall a quaint Norman Rockwellesque painting, but home medical care could be part of a better future, too.

Millions in U.S. Climb Out of Poverty, at Long Last

NY Times, September 25, 2016—By: Patricia Cohen

Alex Caicedo

Alex Caicedo and his family are among the 3.5 million Americans who breached the poverty line last year, according to new census data. Credit Justin T. Gellerson for The New York Times

Not that long ago, Alex Caicedo was stuck working a series of odd jobs and watching his 1984 Chevy Nova cough its last breaths. He could make $21 an hour at the Johnny Rockets food stand at FedEx Field when the Washington Redskins were playing, but the work was spotty.

Today, Mr. Caicedo is an assistant manager at a pizzeria in Gaithersburg, Md., with an annual salary of $40,000 and health benefits. And he is getting ready to move his wife and children out of his mother-in-law’s house and into their own place. Doubling up has been a lifesaver, Mr. Caicedo said, “but nobody just wants to move in with their in-laws.”

The Caicedos are among the 3.5 million Americans who were able to raise their chins above the poverty line last year, according to census data released this month. More than seven years after the recession ended, employers are finally being compelled to reach deeper into the pools of untapped labor, creating more jobs, especially among retailers, restaurants and hotels, and paying higher wages to attract workers and meet new minimum wage requirements.

“It all came together at the same time,” said Diane Swonk, an independent business economist in Chicago. “Lots of employment and wages gains, particularly in the lowest-paying end of the jobs spectrum, combined with minimum-wage increases that started to hit some very large population areas.”

Poverty declined among every group. But African-Americans and Hispanics — who account for more than 45 percent of those below the poverty line of $24,300 for a family of four in most states — experienced the largest improvement.

Government programs — like Social Security, the earned-income tax credit and food stamps — have kept tens of millions from sinking into poverty year after year. But a main driver behind the impressive 1.2 percentage point decline in the poverty rate, the largest annual drop since 1999, was that the economy finally hit a tipping point after years of steady, if lukewarm, improvement.

Declining Poverty

For the first time since the recession began, the poverty rate fell substantially in 2015. The number of people living under the poverty line declined by about 3.5 million, with every major demographic group benefiting from a stronger economy and an expanding job market. For all the improvement, though, poverty remains deeply entrenched, particularly among African-Americans and Hispanics, and is more prevalent in the South and Southwest.

Overall, 2.9 million more jobs were created from 2014 to 2015, helping millions of unemployed people cross over into the ranks of regular wage earners. Many part-time workers increased the number of hours on the job. Wages, adjusted for inflation, climbed.

“Another hidden benefit was lower prices at the pump,” Ms. Swonk said. “People who couldn’t afford the commute before could now afford to accept a minimum-wage job.”

There are different roads out of poverty, said Sheldon Danziger, president of the Russell Sage Foundation, a social science research institution, but today, one of the most promising is to “go somewhere where they raised the minimum wage.”

About 43 million Americans, more than 14 million of them children, are still officially classified as poor, and countless others up and down the income ladder remain worried about their families’ financial security. But the Census Bureau’s report found that 2015 was the first year since 2008, when the economic downturn began, that the poverty rate fell significantly and incomes for most American households rose.

“If you look under the hood of the census report,” Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the conservative research organization American Enterprise Institute, said, “you see more people are working, so fewer people are going to be in poverty.”

After a long period of rising inequality, Elise Gould, an economist at the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute in Washington, added, the benefits of the improving economy finally began to seep downward. Wage increases were “even stronger at the bottom than in the middle,” she said.

For those on the lower rungs of the income ladder, a step upward can be profound. For some, it means the difference between sleeping on a friend’s couch and having a home. For others, it is the change from getting shoes at Goodwill to buying a new pair at Target, or between not having the money to buy your daughter an ice cream cone to getting her a bicycle for her birthday.

Cheyvonné Grayson

Cheyvonné Grayson worked mostly as a day laborer until he got into the carpenters’ union — a feat he could not have achieved, he said, without the help of the Los Angeles Black Worker Center. “That was the door opener.” Credit Emily Berl for The New York Times

The poverty rate fell in 23 states, with Vermont leading the way. The rest stayed flat; none got worse. And other evidence suggests the improvement has continued, if not as strongly, this year.

Mr. Caicedo, 32, initially found his job on Craigslist last summer, starting at $12 an hour. Recently, he was promoted to his salaried position and now drives a 2015 Nissan Pathfinder. His wife was able to leave her job at a clothing store and take care of their four children.

Michael Lastoria, who started the chain called & Pizza where Mr. Caicedo works, said: “We try to pay as close to a fair or living wage as possible,” roughly $2 an hour above the minimum with a steady full-time schedule and benefits. “We want people to have careers, not just jobs,” he said.

The availability of full-time jobs at a livable wage may be essential to move out of poverty but is not necessarily enough. Many poor people, saddled with a deficient education, inadequate health care and few marketable skills, find small setbacks can quickly set off a downward spiral. The lack of resources can prevent them from even reaching the starting gate: no computer to search job sites, no way to compensate for the bad impression a missing tooth can leave.

Many of those who made it had outsize determination, but also benefited from a government or nonprofit program that provided training, financial counseling, job hunting skills, safe havens and other services.

Cheyvonné Grayson, 29, grew up in South-Central Los Angeles, where he, at the age of 14, saw a friend gunned down. Since graduating from high school, Mr. Grayson has worked mostly as a day laborer. In 2014, he was paying $300 a month to sleep on someone’s couch and showing up at 6 a.m., morning after morning, at nonunion construction sites in the hopes of getting work.

Often the supervisors and workers spoke only Spanish, and it was hard to understand the orders and measurements. He remembered one foreman looking him up and down, skeptical that he could do the job.

Christine Magee

Christine Magee, center, a mother of four, joined an intensive self-sufficiency program in 2014 after she fell into bankruptcy. She now has more than $8,000 in savings and a bank letter confirming she qualifies for a mortgage. Credit Whitten Sabbatini for The New York Times

“I had to prove this man wrong,” Mr. Grayson said.

At every site, he said he tried to pick up skills, carefully observing other workers, asking questions and later reinforcing the lessons by watching YouTube videos. Even so, the work was inconsistent and paid poorly, he said.

What made the difference, he said, was getting into the carpenters’ union — a feat he could not have achieved without the help of the Los Angeles Black Worker Center. “That was the door opener,” Mr. Grayson said.

He had to borrow a few hundred dollars for fees and tools, but his first apprenticeship as a carpenter started at $16.16 an hour. He quickly moved up to $20.20 an hour and is paid for his further training. He is now hanging doors for new dormitories at the University of Southern California.

For the first time in his life, he opened a bank account.

Seventeen hundred miles east, Christine Magee, a mother of four, joined an intensive self-sufficiency program administered by the Chicago Housing Authority and the Heartland Alliance after she fell into bankruptcy from racking up $22,000 in debt on a credit card. As a recipient of a federal housing voucher, Ms. Magee was eligible to enroll.

She set three goals after joining the program in 2014: buy a house, raise her dismal credit rating and get a better job that would provide for her retirement someday.

“She was really motivated,” said her counselor, Barbara Martinez. “Not everyone is.”

Ms. Magee’s husband has found only sporadic work. But she has moved from a health-technician job that paid $23,000 a year and left her family on Medicaid to one at a veterans hospital that pays more than $35,000 and provides health and educational benefits. The extra earnings automatically went into an escrow account.

A couple of weeks ago, she graduated from the program with more than $8,000 in savings — which she plans to use for a down payment on a home — and a bank letter confirming she qualifies for a mortgage.

“I knew,” Ms. Magee said, “there was something more out there.” (Back to Top)

It’s Easy for Obamacare Critics to Overlook the Merits of Medicaid Expansion

NY Times, September 26, 2016—By: Aaron E. Carroll (Back to Top)

Medicaid Expansion

Credit Gorka Sampedro

Three years into Obamacare and it seems as if much of the news is bad: private insurers exiting the exchanges, networks being narrowed, premiums rising and competition dwindling out of existence.

But it’s important to remember that many, if not most, of the newly covered Americans became insured through an expansion of Medicaid. Here, too, you hear a lot of bad news: that Medicaid offers poor quality and little choice of providers, that it is expensive for the states to administer and that its growing cost will eventually bankrupt states. As of today, 19 states have still refused to participate in the expansion.

Such declarations consider only one side of the equation, though. In most ways, Medicaid offers an excellent return on investment.

A rigorous analysis of the health benefits of being insured shows that Medicaid works on a number of levels. Critics of the program will point to studies that show that having Medicaid is associated with poor outcomes, even worse than those for the uninsured. Such studies are often flawed, however, in that those on Medicaid are often poorer and sicker than those who are uninsured.

Some good randomized trials do exist. The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment is one of the most recent and best known. Many news articles have been written on the short-term findings of that study, which have been interpreted in many ways, both good and bad. But even that study couldn’t answer many of the long-term, holistic questions about its effects on health.

To see the longer-term benefits across a wider population, we need to turn to other types of studies. They exist as well, usually taking advantage of changes in policy. Medicaid coverage of children and births expanded rapidly from the late 1970s through the early 1990s. When expectant mothers got early prenatal coverage, babies were less likely to be obese when they grew up. They had fewer hospitalizations, especially preventable hospitalizations, for any number of chronic disorders.

Another study from last fall went further. By exploiting new Medicaid eligibility policies, researchers were able to closely compare people with and without benefits. They found that African-Americans who had more years of Medicaid eligibility as children had fewer hospitalizations and emergency department room visits as adults. More years of coverage achieved better results, even with respect to mortality.

Benefits from Medicaid extend beyond health. A 2016 National Bureau of Economic Research working paper examined the effect of the Medicaid expansion on financial outcomes of beneficiaries. Using credit report data, researchers showed that the expansion was associated with a reduction of collection balances of as much as $1,000 for those receiving Medicaid.

The financial benefits extend to society. A study from early 2015 looked at how expanding coverage to children in the 1980s and 1990s affected long-term finances. The analysis showed that children whose eligibility increased were more likely to go to college, earn higher wages and pay more taxes by the time they were 28 years old.

In fact, after accounting for other factors, the researchers estimated that the government would recoup 56 cents on each dollar spent on childhood Medicaid by the time beneficiaries reached age 60. Other studies confirm that Medicaid in childhood makes children more likely to finish high school and college.

At a national level, the expansion of Medicaid continues to yield benefits. Its coverage was increased, and its quality raised. Some states that have expanded Medicaid are even expecting net savings for the next few years. In states where Medicaid was expanded, hospitals had fewer uninsured visits.

Focusing on only the positives can be as misleading as focusing on only the negatives. Policy decisions, including those involving health, need to be considered in terms of trade-offs. It is true that providing Medicaid can cost the federal government, and even states, a lot of money, which can’t then be spent on other worthy pursuits. It is true that Medicaid reimburses physicians and hospitals less generously, and that it often leaves beneficiaries with fewer choices than private insurance might.

But when we look at the balance sheet for Medicaid — health benefits, financial security, societal improvements through education — it’s not hard to argue that money allocated to Medicaid is well spent.

Authorities: Officers use new training to rescue suicidal man from GWB

The Record, September 23, 2016–By Abbott Koloff

Rescue suicidal man from GWB

Photo Courtesy Of The Port Authority Police Department
Port Authority Police Officer Juan Guzman talks down a man hanging from the railing of the George Washington Bridge.

Two Port Authority police officers who completed crisis intervention training in Bergen County last week helped talk a 23-year-old man out of jumping from the George Washington Bridge on Friday, authorities said.

Officer Juan Guzman and Lt. Mike Hennessy, responded to the report of a man threatening to jump from the walkway along the eastbound lanes of the bridge’s upper level at 1:58 p.m. as they were reopening westbound lanes following a tractor-trailer accident, said a Port Authority spokesman, Joseph Pentangelo.

Guzman and Hennessy were participants in a course the New Jersey Crisis Intervention Training Center of Excellence had offered at the Bergen County Law and Public Safety Institute in Mahwah from Sept. 12-16. The center is comprised of law enforcement officials and mental health professionals, according to its website.

The man, a Manhattan resident whose name was not provided by authorities, was transported to NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center to be evaluated, authorities said.

He had climbed over the railing on the walkway, just west of the tower on the New York side of the bridge, and was standing on a ledge overlooking the Hudson River when officers arrived, authorities said. Guzman “engaged the suicidal subject in conversation and established an immediate rapport,” Pentangelo said. Hennessey also participated in helping to talk the man out of jumping, authorities said.

Neither Guzman nor Hennessey were available to discuss the rescue on Friday night, Pentangelo said. The man was reported to the Port Authority police by a tractor-trailer driver who was travelling slowly in the westbound lanes because of the accident and fuel spill, authorities said.

Medicaid Works: States Are Using Flexibility to Create Innovative, Successful Programs

Last week, we explained that one of the reasons Medicaid is so effective is that states have the flexibility to design programs that work for their communities. This week, we’re digging deeper into how states are using their flexibility under Medicaid to streamline health care delivery and improve health.

As CBPP senior policy analyst Hannah Katch writes, states are using Medicaid’s flexibility to coordinate physical and behavioral health care services as well as social services. They’re also moving to integrate services for their most vulnerable beneficiaries by improving communication and data sharing across health care providers and systems to provide effective health services in a timely way. These efforts are improving health outcomes and making Medicaid more efficient by bridging the gap between health care and other services, such as housing assistance.

For example:

  • Missouri has established “health homes” that coordinate care for beneficiaries with chronic physical health conditions or a diagnosed serious mental illness. Early data from the program show a significant drop in emergency department visits and preventable hospitalizations.
  • A Wisconsin hospital is testing a new way to integrate health services for children with complex medical needs, a rapidly growing group with high health care costs. Participants are significantly more likely to report that their health needs are being met. You can read about how other states are innovating Medicaid to great success here.

Copyright © 2016 Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, All rights reserved.

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
820 First Street NE
Washington, DC 2000

Mercer Alliance to End Homelessness welcomes Joyce Campbell, Executive Director of Trenton Area Soup Kitchen (TASK), to our Board of Directors

Mercer Alliance welcomes Joyce Campbell, Executive Director of Trenton Area Soup Kitchen to our Board of Directors. Joyce has over 30 years of non-profit experience and a strong record of collaborating with nonprofits, community and government organizations to advocate for resources for the area’s most vulnerable.

Joyce Campbell

Pictured in photo left to right, Frank Cirillo, Executive Director Mercer Alliance, Joyce Campbell, Executive Director TASK, Clifford Goldman, Board Chairman and Jacqueline (Jackie) Alberts, Board Treasurer.

Mercer Alliance to End Homelessness Receives Community Foundation Grant

Trenton, New Jersey —- Mercer Alliance to End Homelessness received a $25,000.00 grant from the Princeton Area Community Foundation, the community foundation serving Mercer County and central New Jersey, in support of ending chronic homelessness in Trenton and Mercer County. Mercer Alliance to End Homelessness is one of 22 organizations to receive funding through the Community Foundation. Grants totaling more than $500,000.00 were awarded to local nonprofits for a full-range of community building, program and operating support.

Frank A. Cirillo, executive director of the Mercer Alliance to End Homelessness, said the funds would be used to support programming to end chronic homelessness in the Trenton/Mercer community. “The Mercer Alliance to End Homelessness is honored and excited to have been awarded a generous $25,000.00 grant from the Princeton Area Community Foundation to support its ground-breaking work in ending chronic homelessness in the Trenton/Mercer community.

This grant allows the Alliance to more fully develop the Trenton/Mercer Coordinated Entry and Assessment System (CEAS). This system brings public and private partners together to implement an initiative that identifies chronically homeless singles, and that utilizes a Housing First strategy to provide permanent housing and support services to effectively end their homelessness”, said Cirillo.

Founded in 2004, the Mercer Alliance to End Homelessness is a public-private partnership of the county’s business, government and the non-profit sectors. Its mission is to develop and implement strategies and systems to end homelessness in Mercer County through permanent housing.

Utilizing Housing First policy, the Mercer Alliance has developed systems that have become State and national models for ending homelessness for families, singles, and veterans; particularly those experiencing chronic homelessness. As a result of these initiatives singles homelessness in the Trenton/Mercer area has been reduced by 62% compared to the State average of 43% and the national average of 31%, and ended veterans’ homelessness in 2015. Family homelessness has been reduced by 79% compared to the state average of 58% and the national average of 18%.

As impressive as these accomplishments are, there is still a great deal of work to do to prevent homelessness, and to ensure that individuals and families experiencing homelessness are rapidly rehoused and can access the necessary resources and services to succeed.

The Mercer Alliance is extremely grateful that the Princeton Area Community Foundation has recognized the value of supporting its initiatives through the generosity of their grant funding.

The Princeton Area Community Foundation promotes philanthropy to advance the well-being of our communities forever. The Community Foundation provides charitable giving expertise to individuals, nonprofits and corporations, and each year invests millions of dollars into the community through grants and scholarships. For more information on the Community Foundation please contact them at 609-219-1800 or online at www.pacf.org

Towns That Defy Fair-Housing Law

A New York Times Editorial

By THE EDITORIAL BOARD JULY 27, 2016

The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly over three decades that wealthy towns cannot legally exclude housing for low- and moderate-income families.

The rulings, in the Mount Laurel fair-housing case, have helped tens of thousands of low- and moderate-income families find homes in communities where crime is low, schools are good and there is a path to the middle class. But lawyers estimate that more than 100,000 homes that should have been built never were, thanks to resistance by suburban communities and politicians like Gov. Chris Christi, who has tried to kill off the program.

The Supreme Court lost patience last year, when it took the housing program out of the state’s hands and asked the lower courts to get it back on track. But the court must also ensure that communities are held accountable for the affordable housing they failed to allow during those years of resistance. Under the State Constitution, local zoning must allow for the creation of a “fair share” of such housing based on regional growth, jobs and incomes.